Author |
Message |
|
I've just noticed a new "Recent Activity" table in my account page.
Nicely done !
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. |
|
|
|
Just noticed the same. This is a fantastic addition to our available metrics!
Comparing the "Tasks returned in the last 24 hours" values with the Task Status page's information regarding the total number of tasks completed for any given sub-project makes it easy to see if you are at risk of becoming the computational majority for something.
No more guessing :) |
|
|
|
Just noticed the same. This is a fantastic addition to our available metrics!
Comparing the "Tasks returned in the last 24 hours" values with the Task Status page's information regarding the total number of tasks completed for any given sub-project makes it easy to see if you are at risk of becoming the computational majority for something.
No more guessing :)
Wow. I got so excited about the task count column I didn't even notice the rest. I think the others are even better. Great work! |
|
|
Nick  Send message
Joined: 11 Jul 11 Posts: 882 ID: 105020 Credit: 1,318,826,036 RAC: 0
                    
|
That is so cool.
The people at PG are ace |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13513 ID: 53948 Credit: 236,922,854 RAC: 0
                           
|
Glad you like it!
I added a "1st percentage" column that wasn't there when it first went up.
This is a special treat for TdP to make it easier to tell how you're doing.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
Nick  Send message
Joined: 11 Jul 11 Posts: 882 ID: 105020 Credit: 1,318,826,036 RAC: 0
                    
|
Glad you like it!
I added a "1st percentage" column that wasn't there when it first went up.
This is a special treat for TdP to make it easier to tell how you're doing.
That is awesome!
I have been thinking about an app that provides a graph of firsts/DC versus time.
A horizontal gradient means 50% first |
|
|
|
Thankyou very much Michael. :-) |
|
|
robish Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 7 Jan 12 Posts: 1774 ID: 126266 Credit: 5,066,569,935 RAC: 0
                         
|
Truely remarkable! Love it! 🙂
____________
My lucky numbers 10590941048576+1 and 224584605939537911+81292139*23#*n for n=0..26 |
|
|
|
I added a "1st percentage" column that wasn't there when it first went up.
That's an awesome addition. Thank you very much!
____________
676754^262144+1 is prime |
|
|
TimT  Send message
Joined: 2 Dec 11 Posts: 408 ID: 121414 Credit: 1,427,240,743 RAC: 0
                       
|
Fantastic! Thanks for putting that together. |
|
|
|
Very fancy! |
|
|
Dave  Send message
Joined: 13 Feb 12 Posts: 2829 ID: 130544 Credit: 954,747,840 RAC: 0
                     
|
Thanks Mike for this new additio n & its subsequent refinements & twiddlings. |
|
|
|
In the race to get that first finder tag, what good is having a speed demon of a computer if the WUs are idling waiting for previous work to be finished? Thus I think the addition of another column showing the time between first sent and final reporting of the WU (not just the transfer time shown in column five) would be beneficial.
If this time becomes much greater than the sum of send + elapsed + receive time then there is efficiency that can be squeezed out of the system.
Although the send and reporting data are easily known, it might not be datum the BOINC server specifically collects and thus not easy to report. So I don't know how easy it is to implement.
____________
Werinbert is not prime... or PRPnet keeps telling me so.
Badge score: 1x1 + 12x3 + 1x4 + 1x5 + 1x6 + 2x7 + 1x8 + 1x10 = 84 |
|
|
Dave  Send message
Joined: 13 Feb 12 Posts: 2829 ID: 130544 Credit: 954,747,840 RAC: 0
                     
|
Set your resource share from 100 to 0 under PrimeGrid Preferences (for each venue). This will eliminate the pre-fetch. |
|
|
|
Uncertainty about the Tasks, First, and Pct columns...
I have a problem figuring out where the pending results are tallied. Are they included in the tasks? Otherwise, given that most pending tasks will result in a first, barring errors in validation, at what time would they be included in the Firsts column. For the fast tasks, I would think the same day, but for the longer tasks this would likely make those pending tasks flip at a later date. And if they flip at a later date are they simply forgotten as their WU was from a previous date?
____________
Werinbert is not prime... or PRPnet keeps telling me so.
Badge score: 1x1 + 12x3 + 1x4 + 1x5 + 1x6 + 2x7 + 1x8 + 1x10 = 84 |
|
|
|
Uncertainty about the Tasks, First, and Pct columns...
I have a problem figuring out where the pending results are tallied. Are they included in the tasks? Based on what I saw in my table, yes - pending tasks count as firsts until invalidated.
Otherwise, given that most pending tasks will result in a first, barring errors in validation, at what time would they be included in the Firsts column. For the fast tasks, I would think the same day, but for the longer tasks this would likely make those pending tasks flip at a later date. And if they flip at a later date are they simply forgotten as their WU was from a previous date? Based on the comments in the TdP 2020 thread about privacy of this table, this is a live database query of results recorded in the previous 24 hours, and so counts pending tasks like firsts as of they moment they are recorded as complete. If it takes more than 24 hours to validate it won't matters since the pending tasks drop out of the computation just like the firsts. |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13513 ID: 53948 Credit: 236,922,854 RAC: 0
                           
|
Yes, pending counts as "1st" for the purpose of this table. If your computer is producing bad results that later get invalidated, you've got lots more to worry about than being 1st!
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
My question is what is the time frame for showing a pc and not show a pc? I have a bunch of pc's onlyone of which runs full time here and it's the only one that shows up.
I love the new data on my page!!! |
|
|
|
Only the tasks returned in the last 24 hours are considered.
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. |
|
|
|
My question is what is the time frame for showing a pc and not show a pc? I have a bunch of pc's onlyone of which runs full time here and it's the only one that shows up.
I love the new data on my page!!!
It only makes PG more addictive!! ;)
____________
SHSID Electronics Group
SHSIDElectronicsGroup@outlook.com
GFN-14: 50103906^16384+1
Proth "SoB": 44243*2^440969+1
|
|
|
|
Only the tasks returned in the last 24 hours are considered.
That makes sense and keeps the chart smaller, thank you. |
|
|