Join PrimeGrid
Returning Participants
Community
Leader Boards
Results
Other
drummers-lowrise
|
Message boards :
Aggie The Pew message board
: Conjunction of Venus & Jupiter Challenge - SOB
Author |
Message |
|
Upcoming a long challenge on SOB. Help with the double check and maybe up a badge or two.
So anyone willing to dedicate several days to this and to the team is most welcome.
Remember to multi-thread if possible.
Cheers | |
|
Dave  Send message
Joined: 13 Feb 12 Posts: 2829 ID: 130544 Credit: 954,793,678 RAC: 0
                     
|
Yep I'm in. Works well with the interplay of other goals. | |
|
|
Best of luck to all of those participating as well to the team overall.
Hopefully this will be the last challenge for which I will be able AWOL I expect to be "Michael-proof" around Jan 23rd with GCW Sieve and where the 30-day notice if and when it comes thereafter will be more than sufficient to meet the balance of the requirements for the Double Bronze at 100M. | |
|
|
Quick check of the weather suggests it is going to remain quite cool into next week so I hope to go fairly heavy on this one. | |
|
|
All-In! Cool weather should dominate here for the duration of the challenge.
____________
Proud member of Team Aggie the Pew
"Wir müssen wissen. Wir werden wissen."
"We must know, we shall know."
- David Hilbert, 1930 | |
|
TimT  Send message
Joined: 2 Dec 11 Posts: 408 ID: 121414 Credit: 1,427,240,743 RAC: 0
                       
|
I'm in, but just a wee bit nervous that I'll have to kick things off remotely due to being out of town for the next 7 days, so it will likely be a rolling start - I'll maybe switch to some shorter tasks a day or so before it starts... | |
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13513 ID: 53948 Credit: 237,712,514 RAC: 0
                           
|
"Michael-proof"
Is that a new rating for alcohol content? Is it more or less than 100-proof?
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 | |
|
|
"Michael-proof"
Is that a new rating for alcohol content? Is it more or less than 100-proof?
I'm guessing yes, it's more or less. | |
|
|
"Michael-proof"
Is that a new rating for alcohol content? Is it more or less than 100-proof?
It is precisely 30- (or 31-?) proof. The units are days. ;-) :-)
With an RAC of 300k per day, my real challenge is to hit 91 million before any sort of announcement from you know who since the announcement itself (30-proof) translates to 9M credits for me and the balance I need to be done once and for all. Yes, we have a few days after the 30-day period due to units which are being recycled (time-outs, invalid, inconclusive) but I would rather do without such dramatics.
As a result, Jan 23rd is V-day for me since I will be at 91M by then. But this assumes no SoB challenge for me. The irony is that SoB will be my LLR of choice once GCW Sieve is out of the way. | |
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13513 ID: 53948 Credit: 237,712,514 RAC: 0
                           
|
"Michael-proof"
Is that a new rating for alcohol content? Is it more or less than 100-proof?
It is precisely 30- (or 31-?) proof. The units are days. ;-) :-)
With an RAC of 300k per day, my real challenge is to hit 91 million before any sort of announcement from you know who since the announcement itself (30-proof) translates to 9M credits for me and the balance I need to be done once and for all. Yes, we have a few days after the 30-day period due to units which are being recycled (time-outs, invalid, inconclusive) but I would rather do without such dramatics.
As a result, Jan 23rd is V-day for me since I will be at 91M by then. But this assumes no SoB challenge for me. The irony is that SoB will be my LLR of choice once GCW Sieve is out of the way.
You're 50 days away from your next badge. You don't have to worry that participating in this challenge will prevent you from getting the badge. You also don't have to worry about TdP preventing you from getting the badge. Even if you don't start until March, you'll have plenty of time.
"I'm thinking that GCW sieve will go on quite a bit past March." That's Jim, this morning, on Discord. It's going to be at least another month or two beyond March, if not more. You have a lot of time. You should be able to fully participate in EVERY challenge and still have 50 days free to get the badge.
By my calculation, 50 non-challenge days takes you to mid April. The GCW sieve isn't going to end before than. So have fun in all the challenges, and don't worry at all about the GCW sieve badge. You've got more than enough time to do both.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 | |
|
|
By my calculation, 50 non-challenge days takes you to mid April. The GCW sieve isn't going to end before than. So have fun in all the challenges, and don't worry at all about the GCW sieve badge. You've got more than enough time to do both.
Well, this is a great relief and comfort. Yes, mid-April is when the fat lady comes to sing for me if I do participate with each of the challenges into and including March.
@RR: Do we have another private duel? :-P | |
|
|
@RR: Do we have another private duel? :-P
Private? Heck no this will be most public in form and fashion should you choose to accept :)
Just so you know any additional help in any of the challenges is ALWAYS welcome.
Also, even before I read your post I was looking at your current rigs. I'm somewhat concerned because the majority of mine are older and one of them is just temp and will maybe be used for 1 unit. However, that all aside, I hereby throw the guantlet down!
Cheers mate! | |
|
|
@RR: Do we have another private duel? :-P
Private? Heck no this will be most public in form and fashion should you choose to accept :)
Just so you know any additional help in any of the challenges is ALWAYS welcome.
Also, even before I read your post I was looking at your current rigs. I'm somewhat concerned because the majority of mine are older and one of them is just temp and will maybe be used for 1 unit. However, that all aside, I hereby throw the guantlet down!
I have a new build 100% ready to go but with "only" one part missing: a Coffee Lake CPU. Otherwise I would have thrown 18-20 physical cores at you comprised of SkyLake, Kaby Lake and Coffee Lake CPU's and depending if the Coffee Lake is/was an i5 8600k/i7 8700k/i7 9700k. Anyway, I am still actively looking on eBay for that one missing part.
If I don't give you a serious run for the money with SoB, hopefully with TdP I will have that elusive missing Coffee Lake CPU.
By the way, I have reset the cache on all of my systems from "2 days" to "0 days" so as to get a proper start with SoB. | |
|
Dave  Send message
Joined: 13 Feb 12 Posts: 2829 ID: 130544 Credit: 954,793,678 RAC: 0
                     
|
Think I'll set my morning alarm a bit earlier so I can manually press buttons. | |
|
|
Think I'll set my morning alarm a bit earlier so I can manually press buttons.
I have a similar problem since the start time is 07:43 UT+2 for me. Being a night person, this is a problem. However, given the duel with RR, I am sure my smart phone will help out in this regard. | |
|
|
Think I'll set my morning alarm a bit earlier so I can manually press buttons.
I have a similar problem since the start time is 07:43 UT+2 for me. Being a night person, this is a problem. However, given the duel with RR, I am sure my smart phone will help out in this regard.
I never pay attention to the start time until the very last minute. I'm old so I am not sure I can stay awake that long to press the button. Will have to think of something.. can't allow AA to get a jump on this one. Of course in the long run, a few hours on my stuff won't make much of a difference.
Also, for those you who use it, make sure to double check your app_config file. | |
|
|
Also, for those you use it, make sure to double check your app_config file.
Also turning HT off. | |
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13513 ID: 53948 Credit: 237,712,514 RAC: 0
                           
|
Last time I tried this, it didn't work. Maybe I'll get luckier this time.
I've got my main computer set up with prescheduled tasks ready to set No New Work on each computer an appropriate time before the challenge so that each computer's tasks complete before the challenge starts. That way I don't have to remember to stop each computer.
Then, one minute after the challenge begins, it sill send Allow New Work commands to each computer to start running challenge tasks.
The only thing I have to do by hand is change the preferences to SoB.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 | |
|
|
Been reading some of the stories dealing with SOB tasks. Gotta say I am a tad concerned with my systems. We will see. | |
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13513 ID: 53948 Credit: 237,712,514 RAC: 0
                           
|
Been reading some of the stories dealing with SOB tasks. Gotta say I am a tad concerned with my systems. We will see.
Concerned they won't be able to finish a task?
I ran some benchmarks. This computer, which is a first generation Core i3 *laptop*, should be able to complete one task (using two cores) in about 290 hours for the larger of the two FFT sizes, and about 250 or so hours for the smaller FFT size.
That's two slow, non-AVX cores, and it will be able to finish a task with at least 2 days to spare.
Doing a little extrapolation and guesswork, of the 77 thousand active hosts, less than 5 thousand wouldn't able able to finish an SoB task (2880K FFT) during the challenge, and only 3000 would have trouble with the 2560K FFT tasks. That assumes 2 core multi-threading. With 4 cores, it would be cake. Over 90% of active hosts should be able to do this.
Using another metric, of all the computers that participated in last month's challenge (1421), only 11 possibly would have trouble completing a task in the SoB challenge.
Of course, this assumes you run 24/7, set up multi-threading, don't use hyperthreading, and don't run excessive amounts of other stuff on the computer. In short, it assumes you give your computer a good shot at succeeding. Looking at your list of computers, the only ones that might have trouble are the dual core Pentium and the Core2Duo. The C2D can probably handle the 2560K FFT. Not so sure about the Pentium. The other 10 computers should have no trouble at all.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 | |
|
|
... the only ones that might have trouble are the dual core Pentium and the Core2Duo. The C2D can probably handle the 2560K FFT.
I also have two such machines myself. I will get one of them to start crunching one SoB task over the weekend for a few hours so as to get some sort of safe extrapolation.
https://www.primegrid.com/show_host_detail.php?hostid=489096
https://www.primegrid.com/show_host_detail.php?hostid=488101
I realize it means very little but the CPU Benchmark website lists a computation score ever so slightly greater than your i3 M330. If I can indeed squeeze out a unit during the challenge period, I will set both loose since the only purpose of these machines is to crunch PG with absolutely no other activity. | |
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13513 ID: 53948 Credit: 237,712,514 RAC: 0
                           
|
... the only ones that might have trouble are the dual core Pentium and the Core2Duo. The C2D can probably handle the 2560K FFT.
I also have two such machines myself. I will get one of them to start crunching one SoB task over the weekend for a few hours so as to get some sort of safe extrapolation.
https://www.primegrid.com/show_host_detail.php?hostid=489096
https://www.primegrid.com/show_host_detail.php?hostid=488101
I realize it means very little but the CPU Benchmark website lists a computation score ever so slightly greater than your i3 M330. If I can indeed squeeze out a unit during the challenge period, I will set both loose since the only purpose of these machines is to crunch PG with absolutely no other activity.
Your Pentiums run at 2.6 GHz and according to the BOINC benchmarks are only slightly slower than my i3 laptop, so you're probably good. Rick's old Pentium runs at 1.6 GHz which is iffy.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 | |
|
|
My concerns deal more with the actual hardware. Will my memory stand up? I already have a system on the fence. Even my temp system fails randomly for no reason. It just freezes for no reason. I have reviewed my config files, read in the config files and all that.
During the gfn21 a couple of my systems were all over the place. Pretty sure it's some limiting factor but as they are only borrowed I can't really do much to them.
So, my hope and goal is to make sure AA is given the royal treatment :)
I am however all in and invite any and all who wish to join as well.
Go ATP!
Edit: lol just read Mikes comment, that old system probably won't be involved.
Edit: best guess on first task returned, 1 day or slightly longer? | |
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13513 ID: 53948 Credit: 237,712,514 RAC: 0
                           
|
Edit: best guess on first task returned, 1 day or slightly longer?
Certainly faster than that. A run of the mill quad core Kaby Lake 7700K takes a little over a day.
It's all but certain someone's going to put a 12-core X series Skylake on the challenge that can run a lot faster than that.
I'm guessing about 10 hours for the first task.
EDIT: That was really an honest guess. I looked in the database AFTER posting that guess. The shortest elapsed time for a validated SoB in the last 30 days is 9.8 hours.
EDIT 2: That's a Core(TM) i9-7980XE
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 | |
|
|
EDIT: That was really an honest guess. I looked in the database AFTER posting that guess. The shortest elapsed time for a validated SoB in the last 30 days is 9.8 hours.
EDIT 2: That's a Core(TM) i9-7980XE
Can we trouble you for the SoB version of that great table you produced for GFN21 showing the various hardware configurations along with threads per hardware configuration and mean time?
https://www.primegrid.com/forum_thread.php?id=8326&nowrap=true#123710 | |
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13513 ID: 53948 Credit: 237,712,514 RAC: 0
                           
|
EDIT: That was really an honest guess. I looked in the database AFTER posting that guess. The shortest elapsed time for a validated SoB in the last 30 days is 9.8 hours.
EDIT 2: That's a Core(TM) i9-7980XE
Can we trouble you for the SoB version of that great table you produced for GFN21 showing the various hardware configurations along with threads per hardware configuration and mean time?
https://www.primegrid.com/forum_thread.php?id=8326&nowrap=true#123710
Sure.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 | |
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13513 ID: 53948 Credit: 237,712,514 RAC: 0
                           
|
Now that I put up the tables (in the main forum), it should be noted that the fastest Intel time was the i9-7980XE with 18 cores at 9.2 hours.
AMD put in a very respectable time as well, at 15.2 hours for a 16 core Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
It's been a really long time since I've been able to say *anything* nice about AMD.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 | |
|
|
Thanks Mike! Those are some quick systems. | |
|
|
T - 12 hrs. :-) | |
|
|
Here we go .... this should be a lot of fun! | |
|
mfl0p Project administrator Volunteer developer Send message
Joined: 5 Apr 09 Posts: 224 ID: 38042 Credit: 860,159,741 RAC: 0
                       
|
up late, but got a good start | |
|
Tyler Project administrator Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 4 Dec 12 Posts: 1077 ID: 183129 Credit: 1,280,170,555 RAC: 0
                     
|
We'll see how well it works but -- here's what I've been working on this week.
I've tried to make a page that will have graphs of user/team progress throughout the challenge. I believe it should start working when results start coming in, but time will tell :)
The webpage itself is very basic, I'm no designer. But, I believe it should work. If anyone wants to mess with it later on.
There's been a suggestion to have a page for the graph of a user(or team) and the few closest teams as well, sorta like the Free-DC graphs, which could be fun. I'll probably be doing that once I figure it out tomorrow.
The main page is https://statsgr.id/ with a link to Eudy's overall stats, and a link to my page for each of the challenges in my DB. The winter solstice one was/is mostly for testing, with the only data points being from after the challenge was already over. The challenge page shows top 10 users & teams, with links to the full list of both.
Usernames & Team names are hyperlinked to a page with a graph of their score at each datapoint I have for them.
Sample challenge page:
https://statsgr.id/challenge.php?challenge_id=2018_9
Sample challenge team graph: (no real data here, so flat line)
https://statsgr.id/team.php?challenge_id=2018_9&team_id=2280
Hopefully it'll work, not sure if it'll actually be useful or not. Let me know if you have any suggestions! :)
This challenge's page will be https://statsgr.id/challenge.php?challenge_id=2019_1. Of course, there's nothing there quite yet as nobody has any challenge credit yet.
For the actual challenge, I'm running 3 threaded on my i5-2500k and 4 threaded on an E5-2670 :)
____________
275*2^3585539+1 is prime!!! (1079358 digits)
Proud member of Aggie the Pew
| |
|
|
6 systems manually started on or after 7am (UTC) today. My fast quad core is estimating 21h. Another system should be faster, but I didn't see the estimate before I left the house.
Could put more systems on depending on how hot my house feels. Day temps look to remain in single digit C for rest of week, but next couple of nights expected to get frosty. | |
|
|
The main page is https://statsgr.id/ with a link to Eudy's overall stats, and a link to my page for each of the challenges in my DB. The winter solstice one was/is mostly for testing, with the only data points being from after the challenge was already over. The challenge page shows top 10 users & teams, with links to the full list of both.
Usernames & Team names are hyperlinked to a page with a graph of their score at each datapoint I have for them.
Awesome, thank you! I look forward to using this.
I've got everything I have crunching on SoB. My hex-core was a bit tardy finishing its existing work, but got an SoB unit about 3 hours into the Challenge.
____________
Proud member of Team Aggie the Pew
"Wir müssen wissen. Wir werden wissen."
"We must know, we shall know."
- David Hilbert, 1930 | |
|
Dave  Send message
Joined: 13 Feb 12 Posts: 2829 ID: 130544 Credit: 954,793,678 RAC: 0
                     
|
Woke up normal time after dreaming about an Italian shopping centre with no lights on so we'll see what point we stop at in the 8 millions. Celeron estim 27 days & MT, so that ain't happening.
Golfer: will keep on an eye on your site, looks like a fun tracker. | |
|
|
My systems seem to be looking at about 35 hrs (i7 6700k) to 10.7 days (Dell Core2Duo laptop at 2.67 GHz) per unit.
The estimate for my i7 6700k seems a little high but I must wait for the i7 7700k Kaby Lake to kick into action in less than 24 hrs to see how it performs. The former has the GPU doing Collatz (with absolutely trivial CPU contribution at under 1 sec per unit) whereas the latter has no GPU installed. | |
|
|
My 6700k with dual channel, dual rank 3200 ram was estimating 21h. 35h ball park could be expected if you're running basic speed 2133 ram assuming it was purely ram limited.
On quad cores, I think I also have 5775C (L4 cache), 4570S (1600 ram?) and 6600k+8350k (3000 ram) running and will check on the estimates when I get home. Having just written that, I think I might kill the 4570S and put something faster in its place.
7800X at 6 cores quad channel 3000 should be fastest but remains to be seen how much. Got some more exotics I can throw on but things will get really hot so I'm going carefully. | |
|
Scott Brown Volunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer tester Project scientist
 Send message
Joined: 17 Oct 05 Posts: 2165 ID: 1178 Credit: 8,777,295,508 RAC: 0
                                     
|
Woke up by accident about 10 minutes after the challenge start (just before 1am my time), so got a better start than originally anticipated by about 5 hours. My best machine right now (Xeon e5-1650 v3 with 2133 DDR4 running 6 threads) is estimating almost exactly 21 hours. Will see how the collection of Haswell and Ivy Bridge i7s do...
| |
|
Scott Brown Volunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer tester Project scientist
 Send message
Joined: 17 Oct 05 Posts: 2165 ID: 1178 Credit: 8,777,295,508 RAC: 0
                                     
|
Wow! mfl0p already on the board at just over 7 hours! Very impressive!
| |
|
|
My 6700k with dual channel, dual rank 3200 ram was estimating 21h. 35h ball park could be expected if you're running basic speed 2133 ram assuming it was purely ram limited.
My MSI H110M motherboard indeed has a limit of 2133 MHz and in spite of the sticks being 2666 MHz. I plan to swap them out and replace them with 2400 MHz (not that it will make a difference) so as to use the 2666 MHz sticks in the Coffee Lake system waiting on the sidelines and whose mobo (MSI H310M) has a limit of 2666 MHz. | |
|
|
Wow! mfl0p already on the board at just over 7 hours! Very impressive!
Indeed very impressive! | |
|
James Project administrator Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 19 Sep 14 Posts: 95 ID: 366225 Credit: 523,713,437 RAC: 0
                   
|
Wow! mfl0p already on the board at just over 7 hours! Very impressive!
I see the Xeon 8124m is an Amazon AWS-only chip. How much does it cost to run PG on there? | |
|
|
With the best intentions of staying up late to start, this old man was in bed and fast asleep by 8:30 last night. Any way got 8 systems running now. A tad late but hopefully enough to keep up with AA.
@Golfer - wonderful idea! Looks like it's working and it's nice to see AtP on the board. Are you going to allow us to segment by team and show all users for just that team by chance?
@mfl0p - unbelievable !
Just a reminder, CNT has some folks who are caching tasks to turn in at the last moment so lets not let our guard down.
Go AtP ! | |
|
|
Wow! mfl0p already on the board at just over 7 hours! Very impressive!
Way to go mfl0p. !
More than 4 times faster than my box.
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. | |
|
|
1998golfer wrote: ...
The main page is https://statsgr.id/
...
Thank you !
It'll be nice to see those curves evolving.
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. | |
|
|
18 cores at 3 GHz base... apparently supports 6 channel 2666 ram. Can't view unit details yet to see if all those cores were in use, but even at base clock it would be ram bandwidth limited... if it wasn't for the L3 cache, which looks like it is big enough to hold the active data. Extrapolating from my own reference point it could be closer to 6 hours with perfect scaling, so 7 hours is still very nice. | |
|
Dave  Send message
Joined: 13 Feb 12 Posts: 2829 ID: 130544 Credit: 954,793,678 RAC: 0
                     
|
Golfer, why is 288larson a swoopy curve & other are just a solid bar (granted we don't have much of a database yet)? | |
|
Tyler Project administrator Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 4 Dec 12 Posts: 1077 ID: 183129 Credit: 1,280,170,555 RAC: 0
                     
|
Golfer, why is 288larson a swoopy curve & other are just a solid bar (granted we don't have much of a database yet)?
Yeah that's why -- 288larsson is the only one who has more than one result in. So everyone else only has one score value, the same at each time.
(also just realized I had the graphs' time backwards -- fixed that)
Also kinda weird how the graph "swoops" down a bit.. Not sure I like that.
Edit: fixed the "swoopy" thing | |
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13513 ID: 53948 Credit: 237,712,514 RAC: 0
                           
|
Why does CNT & Killik show a blank chart?
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 | |
|
Tyler Project administrator Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 4 Dec 12 Posts: 1077 ID: 183129 Credit: 1,280,170,555 RAC: 0
                     
|
Why does CNT & Killik show a blank chart?
There's only one "data point" for them so far, so there's just a dot instead of a line til the next update. Not sure what I can do about that one.. | |
|
|
7800X (4.0 GHz, 4x3000 ram) 17h
6700k (4.0 GHz, 2x3200 ram) 21h
8350k (4.0 GHz, 2x3000 ram) 23.5h
6600k (3.6 GHz, 2x2666 ram) 27h
5775C (3.6 GHz, 2x2400 ram) 29h
4570S (3.2 GHz, 2x1333 ram) 39h
Current time estimates above. 7800X is a bit disappointing. 24% faster than the 6700k, yet there is 50% more CPU potential and 88% more potential bandwidth.
4570S has slower ram than I remember, but now that I see it, it is a mobo limitation so I can't increase it.
Current plan is I'll retire 7800X and 4570S once current units are done. I have another 6700k I will bring online in a moment, and will probably throw in a 5675C too. | |
|
|
Some more data ...
i7 6700k (4.0 GHz, 2x4Gb @ 2133 MHz) -> 38.8 hrs (-t4)
i7 7700k (4.2 Ghz, 2x4Gb @ 2133 MHz) -> in action tomorrow
i3 6300 (3.8 Ghz, 2x4Gb @ 2133 MHz) -> 46.9 hrs (-t2)
i3 6100 (3.7 GHz, 2x4Gb @ 2133 MHz) -> 45.3 hrs (-t2)
C2D P9600 (2.66 GHz, 2x2Gb @ 400 MHz) -> 422.50 hrs (-t2)
The laptop with the C2D processor will not finish in time but I will wait a further 12 hrs so as to perhaps acquire a more credible estimate. If nothing changes, I will kill the unit and revert back to GCW Sieve for this system. | |
|
|
My pending credit for GCW Sieve went from 65k to over 125k in a matter of hours and as we approached the start of the challenge. It is now back to 71k. Either someone dumped a serious amount of work or, most probably, people have backed off with SoB (due to the lengthy run times) and reverted back to their previous work. | |
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13513 ID: 53948 Credit: 237,712,514 RAC: 0
                           
|
Current tasks/estimates, including threads and FFT size:
Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz 4c/8t -t4 2560K 26.25 hours
Core(TM) i5-4670K CPU @ 3.40GHz 4c/4t -t4 2560K 30.5 hours
Core(TM) i5-7200U CPU @ 2.50GHz 2c/4t -t2 2880K 81.5 hours
Core(TM) i3-4005U CPU @ 1.70GHz 2c/4t -t2 2880K 135 hours
Core(TM) i3 CPU 550 @ 3.20GHz 2c/4t -t2 2560K 214.25 hours
Core(TM) i3 CPU M 330 @ 2.13GHz 2c/4t -t2 2560K 281.5 hours
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 | |
|
|
i7 7700k (4.2 Ghz, 2x4Gb @ 2133 MHz) -> in action tomorrow
I just did a remote connect and I have a very small queue (3 units). As a result, I will have my Kaby Lake doing SoB quite shortly.
What threw me off is the stats on PG for this machine and which show 100 units "In Progress".
@Michael: https://www.primegrid.com/results.php?hostid=940010&offset=0&show_names=0&state=0&appid=29
Edit: The problem is probably related to dropped connections. Let's ignore it for now. | |
|
|
And we have another rat on board. Congrats SkyHighWeFly | |
|
|
I think my estimates earlier were affected by FFT size. Got 5675C on now, 3.6 GHz, 2x1866 ram, just over 25h which is faster than the 5775C at same clock. Still setting up 6700k system. | |
|
|
Freezing of SG is kicking it. | |
|
Dave  Send message
Joined: 13 Feb 12 Posts: 2829 ID: 130544 Credit: 954,793,678 RAC: 0
                     
|
Got 5675C
Your CPU is hotter than the surface of the Sun!!!... | |
|
|
I'm out due to lack of suitable hardware. I'm still watching, but I'm gcw-sieving-it-up in to meantime. Go AtP!!!
Gary++ | |
|
Tyler Project administrator Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 4 Dec 12 Posts: 1077 ID: 183129 Credit: 1,280,170,555 RAC: 0
                     
|
Finally got this part working..
Shows the top 10 teams on a graph with eachother. You can click on the labels at the top with the team names to remove them from the graph if you want to see less.
https://statsgr.id/top_team_graph.php
Starts at the first time that anyone had any credit, so it looks like AtP starts with 5000 on the graph ;)
Will do users as well when I have time, and maybe some other graphs. Doing this got me a bit of a template to use for similar types. | |
|
Dave  Send message
Joined: 13 Feb 12 Posts: 2829 ID: 130544 Credit: 954,793,678 RAC: 0
                     
|
The visual interplay between the top 2 teams is already starting to plait itself in knots. | |
|
|
After a day and a tad more we have 6 ratties on board. AtP is currently in 5th. This is a long haul challenge :)
Rank Name Score
12 mackerel 279,964.25
17 mfl0p 221,534.56
25 SkyHighWeFly 162,596.63
34 Scott Brown 104,904.41
38 Michael Goetz 104,591.47
66 ILW8 52,292.79
Go AtP!
| |
|
|
I'm also onboard.
But as I'm seasick, I won't get out of my cabin for a few more hours :)
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. | |
|
|
I will be dumping FOUR units over the next little while starting with the first one in about 3.75 hrs. | |
|
|
@Eudy - get better soon or get off the ship :) (but NOT the team)
@AA - you have me nervous now.. | |
|
|
@AA - you have me nervous now..
I will be on the board in less than 3.5 hrs and, around midnight your time, easily three units and the fourth (i7 7700k) will most probably squeeze-in by then as well.
Expect roughly the equivalent of about 130k per day from me .... | |
|
|
@AA - well at least I drew first blood :) | |
|
|
@AA - well at least I drew first blood :)
I will be saying hello in 39 minutes.
What has me puzzled is my i7 7700K ... it will require around 44 hrs to complete the current task. I realize that FFT sizes do vary from task to task but my i3 SkyLakes with half the physical cores (and GPU running!) need the same time as the quad core Kaby Lake (with no GPU).
Does not compute! | |
|
|
What has me puzzled is my i7 7700K ... it will require around 44 hrs to complete the current task. I realize that FFT sizes do vary from task to task but my i3 SkyLakes with half the physical cores (and GPU running!) need the same time as the quad core Kaby Lake (with no GPU).
I'd guess it could be a combo of FFT size and ram bandwidth limiting. i3 are practically unlimited in that sense, although I'd still expect a quad core to be somewhat faster. Don't know what the delta in WU times are between the two FFT sizes but it might account for it. | |
|
|
What has me puzzled is my i7 7700K ... it will require around 44 hrs to complete the current task. I realize that FFT sizes do vary from task to task but my i3 SkyLakes with half the physical cores (and GPU running!) need the same time as the quad core Kaby Lake (with no GPU).
I'd guess it could be a combo of FFT size and ram bandwidth limiting. i3 are practically unlimited in that sense, although I'd still expect a quad core to be somewhat faster. Don't know what the delta in WU times are between the two FFT sizes but it might account for it.
It begs the question as to whether I should run two tasks simultaneously on the quad core Kaby Lake.
What is puzzling is that my i7 6700k will prove to be faster than the i7 7700k by about six hours which may (?) be due to FFT size. The irony is that the i7 6700k also has a 1080 running Collatz on a 24/7 basis but with trivial CPU contribution (0.7 sec per six-minute task) whereas the i7 7700k is naked (no GPU).
I am literally minutes away from finishing up the i7 6700k unit. Hopefully it will prove to have the smaller of the two FFT sizes which may (?) explain the six-hr difference.
Edit: Okay, my first task is in with an FFT length of 2880K. | |
|
|
@AA - well at least I drew first blood :)
You can add one more rat on the board. :-) | |
|
|
@AA - well at least I drew first blood :)
You can add one more rat on the board. :-)
Current status (11 Atp members):
Last update: 2019-01-08 21:15:06
Rank Name Team Score
16 mfl0p Aggie The Pew 384,678.29
19 mackerel Aggie The Pew 332,642.05
32 SkyHighWeFly Aggie The Pew 162,596.63
34 Scott Brown Aggie The Pew 157,336.15
47 ILW8 Aggie The Pew 104,919.16
52 Michael Goetz Aggie The Pew 104,591.47
56 mattozan Aggie The Pew 58,482.96
57 zunewantan Aggie The Pew 58,428.15
60 Eudy Silva Aggie The Pew 58,387.66
66 Anthony Ayiomamitis Aggie The Pew 58,193.47
77 Rick Reynolds Aggie The Pew 52,581.02
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. | |
|
Tyler Project administrator Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 4 Dec 12 Posts: 1077 ID: 183129 Credit: 1,280,170,555 RAC: 0
                     
|
@AA - well at least I drew first blood :)
You can add one more rat on the board. :-)
Current status (11 Atp members):
Hopefully i'll be there soon too.. | |
|
|
@Eudy - first thanks for posting the stats. 2nd, there is something wrong with the stats. No way AA is ahead of me. | |
|
|
@Eudy - first thanks for posting the stats. 2nd, there is something wrong with the stats. No way AA is ahead of me.
Remember to check the stats on the official challenge page in 5.5 and 7.0 hrs, respectively. :-P | |
|
|
@Eudy - first thanks for posting the stats. 2nd, there is something wrong with the stats. No way AA is ahead of me.
Nah, the stats are right.
You were behind and still are :)
Last update: 2019-01-08 21:45:06
Rank Name Team Score
17 mfl0p Aggie The Pew 384,678.29
19 mackerel Aggie The Pew 332,642.05
32 SkyHighWeFly Aggie The Pew 162,596.63
34 Scott Brown Aggie The Pew 157,336.15
49 ILW8 Aggie The Pew 104,919.16
54 Michael Goetz Aggie The Pew 104,591.47
58 mattozan Aggie The Pew 58,482.96
59 zunewantan Aggie The Pew 58,428.15
62 Eudy Silva Aggie The Pew 58,387.66
68 Anthony Ayiomamitis Aggie The Pew 58,193.47
79 Rick Reynolds Aggie The Pew 52,581.02
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. | |
|
Scott Brown Volunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer tester Project scientist
 Send message
Joined: 17 Oct 05 Posts: 2165 ID: 1178 Credit: 8,777,295,508 RAC: 0
                                     
|
I have several i7-4790s that should start dumping units over the next 1 to 5 hours. I hope that they'll be enough to push AtP up to be competitive with the top three spots.
And to see what a huge difference cache and memory speeds are making with these larger SoB tasks, consider this comparison of two quad cores running with HT on and 50% CPU:
i7-4790 (Haswell) @ 3.6Ghz, DDR3 dual channel and 8mb L3 cache running 4t
about 40 hours (or about 143k seconds)
E5-1650 (Haswell) @ 3.5Ghz, DDR4 quad channel and 10mb L3 cache running 4t
about 32 hours (or about 116k seconds)
...and the Xeon is running a GTX 1060 as well on GFN19.
EDIT: Those comparisons are on units with the 2560k fft | |
|
|
We have one glaring omission. Hopefully all is well with Zimmer! | |
|
Dave  Send message
Joined: 13 Feb 12 Posts: 2829 ID: 130544 Credit: 954,793,678 RAC: 0
                     
|
@AA - well at least I drew first blood :)
You can add one more rat on the board. :-)
Current status (11 Atp members):
Hopefully i'll be there soon too..
Dumping one in a few hours then the next tomorrow eve.
I feel somewhat swamped against all this more modern hardware. | |
|
|
I feel somewhat swamped against all this more modern hardware.
Ah, don't feel bad. Unless you plan on upgrading it's all good :)
@Scott - bring it on down !
@AA - yeah now I really am nervous. Good thing I can mail your winnings IF that happens. I have one that will turn in maybe in a couple hours but all the rest - 2 days out. dang | |
|
|
I'm in, by the way. 58% through what must be a big WU. I started late, though. | |
|
|
I feel somewhat swamped against all this more modern hardware.
Ah, don't feel bad. Unless you plan on upgrading it's all good :)
With 321 Sieve just around the corner, even dated hardware has its uses. | |
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13513 ID: 53948 Credit: 237,712,514 RAC: 0
                           
|
@AA - well at least I drew first blood :)
I will be saying hello in 39 minutes.
What has me puzzled is my i7 7700K ... it will require around 44 hrs to complete the current task. I realize that FFT sizes do vary from task to task but my i3 SkyLakes with half the physical cores (and GPU running!) need the same time as the quad core Kaby Lake (with no GPU).
Does not compute!
I agree. That's not expected. While I don't have a 7700K, I do have a Xeon which is almost the identical CPU. The 7700K is a little bit faster.
I did benchmarks before the challenge, and the run times for the 2560K tasks should be 26 hours and for the 2880K tasks it should be 30 hours. The tasks have grown a little bit, but your 7700K should also be outperforming my Xeon. 26 and 30 hours should be in the right ballpark.
40 hours is 10 hours too long. You're correct to be thinking something's not right.
This is, of course, running -t4.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 | |
|
|
@AA - well at least I drew first blood :)
I will be saying hello in 39 minutes.
What has me puzzled is my i7 7700K ... it will require around 44 hrs to complete the current task. I realize that FFT sizes do vary from task to task but my i3 SkyLakes with half the physical cores (and GPU running!) need the same time as the quad core Kaby Lake (with no GPU).
Does not compute!
I agree. That's not expected. While I don't have a 7700K, I do have a Xeon which is almost the identical CPU. The 7700K is a little bit faster.
I did benchmarks before the challenge, and the run times for the 2560K tasks should be 26 hours and for the 2880K tasks it should be 30 hours. The tasks have grown a little bit, but your 7700K should also be outperforming my Xeon. 26 and 30 hours should be in the right ballpark.
40 hours is 10 hours too long. You're correct to be thinking something's not right.
This is, of course, running -t4.
According to Process Lasso, my memory load is only 35%. The core temps are reasonable (68-70d C) and they are running at 4200 MHz.
With CPUID, I see the frequency toggling back and forth between 798 and 4200 MHz.
Edit: I checked my two i3 Skylakes using CPU-Z and they are steady at 3.7 and 3.8 GHz respectively whereas the i7 Kaby Lake is throttling between 798 and 4200 MHz. I recall the BIOS having a throttle option and I am fairly certain it has not been deactivated. Time to get into the BIOS for its deactivation.[/b] | |
|
|
With CPUID, I see the frequency toggling back and forth between 798 and 4200 MHz.
Edit: I checked my two i3 Skylakes using CPU-Z and they are steady at 3.7 and 3.8 GHz respectively whereas the i7 Kaby Lake is throttling between 798 and 4200 MHz. I recall the BIOS having a throttle option and I am fairly certain it has not been deactivated. Time to get into the BIOS for its deactivation.[/b]
Try hwinfo64. In particular, you can see if it is current, power or thermal limiting at all. | |
|
|
With CPUID, I see the frequency toggling back and forth between 798 and 4200 MHz.
Edit: I checked my two i3 Skylakes using CPU-Z and they are steady at 3.7 and 3.8 GHz respectively whereas the i7 Kaby Lake is throttling between 798 and 4200 MHz. I recall the BIOS having a throttle option and I am fairly certain it has not been deactivated. Time to get into the BIOS for its deactivation.[/b]
Try hwinfo64. In particular, you can see if it is current, power or thermal limiting at all.
As I had suspected, I had forgotten to disable the thermal throttle option in the BIOS. CPU-Z now shows the cores at a steady 4200 MHz with occasional bursts to 4400+ MHz. Ditto for HWMonitor with the cores now steady at 4200 MHz.
I am fairly certain the problem has been identified and fixed. | |
|
|
Maybe it is just me but I'm not sure I want to disable a thermal throttle, but improve cooling or lower settings so it doesn't reach that state in first place. | |
|
|
A few weeks after I joined PG , in 2017, I got scared because my CPU would easily get to 95 degrees Celsius when crunching.
It's a Skylake i7-6700 @ 3.4GHz.
The standard CPU fan, just blowing air on the chip, cannot handle the necessary heat dissipation when the work is steady 98-100%, even if just for some minutes.
I then bought an H60 Corsair water cooler.
The difference is huge.
For example, I'm now crunching SOB, 4 threads, and the cores stay around 66-68 C.
Literally, cool !
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. | |
|
|
Maybe it is just me but I'm not sure I want to disable a thermal throttle, but improve cooling or lower settings so it doesn't reach that state in first place.
Without thermal throttling enabled, my core temps have risen by five degrees and are now hovering between 74 and 75d C whereas I was 69d to 70d C yesterday. All of this with now double the performance. I just reported the completed unit with a total elapsed time of 40 hrs and which is a hybrid result with the first 47% requiring 22 hrs and lots of throttling whereas the latter 53% breezed through in about 17 hrs.
I always monitor my hardware and I will make sure temps do not get out of control during the challenge. GCW Sieve is relatively much tamer and it was never an issue either way. I also have to apply new paste to all of my systems given the arrival of Arctic MX-4 a couple of weeks ago. | |
|
|
The standard CPU fan, just blowing air on the chip, cannot handle the necessary heat dissipation when the work is steady 98-100%, even if just for some minutes.
I then bought an H60 Corsair water cooler.
The difference is huge.
For example, I'm now crunching SOB, 4 threads, and the cores stay around 66-68 C.
Literally, cool !
I have a Noctua unit cooling my i7 6700k and it does do wonders with the temperatures. It is no coincidence that I picked up a second such unit for the Coffee Lake build waiting for a CPU to become available.
I agree that the stock Intel cooler is out of its league for the i7 Skylake CPU's. I have them in use for the i3 Skylakes and they do a fine job with only two cores. | |
|
|
We are closing in on the #1 spot overall.
No need to mention which two rodents are at #1 and #2 in the individual standings. Good to also see Zimmer doing his thing. | |
|
|
AA wrote: We are closing in on the #1 spot overall.
No need to mention which two rodents are at #1 and #2 in the individual standings. Good to also see Zimmer doing his thing.
Great !
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. | |
|
|
Windows updates strike again! | |
|
|
Windows updates strike again!
I had my turn last night with all four systems. :-( | |
|
|
[Without thermal throttling enabled, my core temps have risen by five degrees and are now hovering between 74 and 75d C whereas I was 69d to 70d C yesterday.
...
I also have to apply new paste to all of my systems given the arrival of Arctic MX-4 a couple of weeks ago.
I scraped and re-applied the thermal paste when I re-built my i7-5820K Haswell cruncher with Noctua NH-D15 cooler. I hoped it might bring the core temps down a bit, but I don't think it made much difference.
Four of my cores bounce around in the 70's. One is a few degrees warmer, into the 80's. And the last core is always much hotter, peaking in the 90's.
At this point, though, I'm happy enough to run this rig into the ground. With no climate control in our apartment I'll only be able to crunch during the cold months anyway, which just increases its slope-angle into obsolescence. I'm not too interested in underclocking a five-generation-old CPU just to make it last longer. One of the GPU slots on the mobo has already gone kaput. If the CPU burns out, I'll get to replace the whole thing with a Coffee Lake setup.
____________
Proud member of Team Aggie the Pew
"Wir müssen wissen. Wir werden wissen."
"We must know, we shall know."
- David Hilbert, 1930 | |
|
|
Without thermal throttling enabled, my core temps have risen by five degrees and are now hovering between 74 and 75d C whereas I was 69d to 70d C yesterday.
I've not come across limiting at such temps before. I wouldn't be worried about 75C. I thought the thermal limit you were talking about was the one around 100C! | |
|
|
I'm on the board...woo hoo! | |
|
|
Brook Harste wrote: I'm on the board...woo hoo!
Good !
That makes 16 of us now.
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. | |
|
|
Brook Harste wrote: I'm on the board...woo hoo!
Good !
That makes 16 of us now.
And when will your "incorrect" stats be out again? | |
|
|
Brook Harste wrote: I'm on the board...woo hoo!
Good !
That makes 16 of us now.
And when will your "incorrect" stats be out again?
@RR: A friendly heads-up: I will be dumping four units tomorrow during the day. :-) | |
|
|
RR wrote: Eudy wrote: Brook Harste wrote: I'm on the board...woo hoo!
Good !
That makes 16 of us now.
And when will your "incorrect" stats be out again?
I'm "uncertain" :)
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. | |
|
|
Last update: 2019-01-09 17:00:06
Rank Name Team Score
1 zunewantan Aggie The Pew 2,565,721.00
4 Scott Brown Aggie The Pew 1,462,225.46
21 mackerel Aggie The Pew 660,632.56
25 SkyHighWeFly Aggie The Pew 540,897.76
26 mfl0p Aggie The Pew 496,238.77
35 Van Zimmerman Aggie The Pew 280,944.95
44 Anthony Ayiomamitis Aggie The Pew 221,374.90
52 ILW8 Aggie The Pew 209,367.16
70 Michael Goetz Aggie The Pew 157,255.30
78 mattozan Aggie The Pew 111,265.45
113 Rick Reynolds Aggie The Pew 101,348.41
114 gazzyk1ns Aggie The Pew 58,664.15
116 Eudy Silva Aggie The Pew 58,387.66
119 Dave Aggie The Pew 58,284.65
147 1998golfer Aggie The Pew 52,339.58
153 Brook Harste Aggie The Pew 52,193.42
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. | |
|
|
Thanks Eudy - go ratties go! Got 16 on the board.
AA looks to have a commanding lead at the moment. | |
|
|
AA looks to have a commanding lead at the moment.
You are setting me up .... | |
|
Dave  Send message
Joined: 13 Feb 12 Posts: 2829 ID: 130544 Credit: 954,793,678 RAC: 0
                     
|
Sorry for email 'noise', just hit "make unsticky" by mistake...
I'll have one more @ 22:30UT today then another ~16:30UT tomorrow. Aiming for 11 total. If i7 can do <45hrs for a 2880FFT it can do 8 in 360 hours. | |
|
|
Last update: 2019-01-09 23:45:06
Rank Name Team Score
1 zunewantan Aggie The Pew 3,120,023.33
6 Scott Brown Aggie The Pew 1,573,436.33
22 mackerel Aggie The Pew 660,632.56
25 mfl0p Aggie The Pew 601,916.56
26 SkyHighWeFly Aggie The Pew 593,764.55
42 Van Zimmerman Aggie The Pew 333,640.97
54 Anthony Ayiomamitis Aggie The Pew 221,374.90
61 Michael Goetz Aggie The Pew 209,874.90
63 ILW8 Aggie The Pew 209,367.16
90 Dave Aggie The Pew 116,611.94
92 mattozan Aggie The Pew 111,265.45
100 Brook Harste Aggie The Pew 110,833.23
122 1998golfer Aggie The Pew 104,660.05
127 Rick Reynolds Aggie The Pew 101,348.41
128 gazzyk1ns Aggie The Pew 58,664.15
129 shinozk Aggie The Pew 58,658.92
133 Eudy Silva Aggie The Pew 58,387.66
17 rats crunching.
I'm watching your back, guys.
Keep going !
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. | |
|
|
19 teammates are in the challenge
Last update: 2019-01-10 15:15:06
Rank Name Team Score
1 zunewantan Aggie The Pew 3,668,464.28
5 Scott Brown Aggie The Pew 2,156,420.31
21 mackerel Aggie The Pew 941,875.99
27 SkyHighWeFly Aggie The Pew 815,073.66
29 mfl0p Aggie The Pew 766,012.92
34 Van Zimmerman Aggie The Pew 556,827.12
58 Anthony Ayiomamitis Aggie The Pew 280,148.84
66 ILW8 Aggie The Pew 268,036.80
67 Michael Goetz Aggie The Pew 262,712.58
93 Rick Reynolds Aggie The Pew 206,687.05
94 shinozk Aggie The Pew 170,151.77
109 TimT Aggie The Pew 158,645.31
116 Eudy Silva Aggie The Pew 117,127.17
120 Dave Aggie The Pew 116,611.94
123 mattozan Aggie The Pew 111,265.45
129 Brook Harste Aggie The Pew 110,833.23
148 1998golfer Aggie The Pew 104,660.05
153 gazzyk1ns Aggie The Pew 58,664.15
156 Kouhki Aggie The Pew 58,446.39
Rank Name Score
1 Czech National Team 12,365,352.24
2 Aggie The Pew 10,928,665.01
3 SETI.Germany 8,708,802.19
4 Sicituradastra. 8,409,285.41
5 Crunching@EVGA 3,934,034.92
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. | |
|
|
For just a few this is a nice grouping
53 Rick Reynolds Aggie The Pew 487,746.52
54 Anthony Ayiomamitis Aggie The Pew 450,191.32 | |
|
|
For just a few this is a nice grouping
53 Rick Reynolds Aggie The Pew 487,746.52
54 Anthony Ayiomamitis Aggie The Pew 450,191.32
Now, also Dave and I.
Last update: 2019-01-11 14:45:06
Rank Name Team Score
1 zunewantan Aggie The Pew 5,150,917.99
3 Scott Brown Aggie The Pew 3,674,097.53
21 mackerel Aggie The Pew 1,381,769.18
26 SkyHighWeFly Aggie The Pew 1,137,649.10
33 mfl0p Aggie The Pew 995,431.82
36 Van Zimmerman Aggie The Pew 884,692.57
53 Rick Reynolds Aggie The Pew 487,746.52
54 Anthony Ayiomamitis Aggie The Pew 450,191.32
59 shinozk Aggie The Pew 433,496.62
68 TimT Aggie The Pew 381,646.67
71 Michael Goetz Aggie The Pew 373,819.99
83 mattozan Aggie The Pew 327,033.21
88 ILW8 Aggie The Pew 320,918.62
128 Brook Harste Aggie The Pew 169,636.49
131 Eudy Silva Aggie The Pew 169,379.12
132 Dave Aggie The Pew 169,036.07
139 1998golfer Aggie The Pew 163,255.63
151 gazzyk1ns Aggie The Pew 117,524.68
173 Kouhki Aggie The Pew 58,446.39
Rank Name Score
1 Czech National Team 17,483,294.98
2 Aggie The Pew 16,846,689.53
3 SETI.Germany 13,539,318.23
4 Sicituradastra. 12,159,555.32
5 TeAm AnandTech 5,287,261.31
6 Rechenkraft.net 5,216,819.23
7 Crunching@EVGA 5,094,661.32
8 BOINC@MIXI 3,714,307.45
9 The Knights Who Say Ni! 3,604,967.37
10 AMD Users 2,893,057.77
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. | |
|
|
For just a few this is a nice grouping
53 Rick Reynolds Aggie The Pew 487,746.52
54 Anthony Ayiomamitis Aggie The Pew 450,191.32
Hey you, this is a 15-day duel.
By the way, my Kaby Lake will have its first sub 30-hr result in a few hours which is encouraging. | |
|
|
For just a few this is a nice grouping
53 Rick Reynolds Aggie The Pew 487,746.52
54 Anthony Ayiomamitis Aggie The Pew 450,191.32
Hey you, this is a 15-day duel.
By the way, my Kaby Lake will have its first sub 30-hr result in a few hours which is encouraging.
Yes and that's what I meant by "just a few" meaning you would swing past me again soon. I told you I am nervous about this one. I have several systems taking 3-4 days for a single unit but then they turn in and help me see the sun light you keep blocking. | |
|
Dave  Send message
Joined: 13 Feb 12 Posts: 2829 ID: 130544 Credit: 954,793,678 RAC: 0
                     
|
Something's going on. Is someone having a dump? | |
|
Scott Brown Volunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer tester Project scientist
 Send message
Joined: 17 Oct 05 Posts: 2165 ID: 1178 Credit: 8,777,295,508 RAC: 0
                                     
|
Something's going on. Is someone having a dump?
A bunch of Z-san's machines are cycling through again as well as a few of mine. I think we have pretty much caught the Czechs now, although they will likely push back ahead as they have a more constant flow, while we tend to surge and wane.
| |
|
|
For just a few this is a nice grouping
53 Rick Reynolds Aggie The Pew 487,746.52
54 Anthony Ayiomamitis Aggie The Pew 450,191.32
Hey you, this is a 15-day duel.
By the way, my Kaby Lake will have its first sub 30-hr result in a few hours which is encouraging.
Yes and that's what I meant by "just a few" meaning you would swing past me again soon. I told you I am nervous about this one. I have several systems taking 3-4 days for a single unit but then they turn in and help me see the sun light you keep blocking.
I particularly like your modulo 3. Thanks!
Edit: The existing delta of 96k will be erased in less than 12 hrs. :-) | |
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13513 ID: 53948 Credit: 237,712,514 RAC: 0
                           
|
For the last two updates we've been about 1 task out of first place.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 | |
|
|
Edit: The existing delta of 96k will be erased in less than 12 hrs. :-)
Good thing I have some turning in around then as well :) | |
|
Dave  Send message
Joined: 13 Feb 12 Posts: 2829 ID: 130544 Credit: 954,793,678 RAC: 0
                     
|
Edit: The existing delta of 96k will be erased in less than 12 hrs. :-)
Good thing I have some turning in around then as well :)
Snap, 12 & 13 hours. | |
|
RogerVolunteer developer Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 27 Nov 11 Posts: 1137 ID: 120786 Credit: 267,535,355 RAC: 0
                    
|
Reported my first WU. Should have just enough time for 2 more. | |
|
|
Currently, 21 AtP membres are in the challenge !
Last update: 2019-01-12 15:30:07
Rank Name Team Score
1 zunewantan Aggie The Pew 7,220,388.98
3 Scott Brown Aggie The Pew 4,487,766.30
19 mackerel Aggie The Pew 1,874,399.37
29 SkyHighWeFly Aggie The Pew 1,412,626.65
32 mfl0p Aggie The Pew 1,324,054.49
35 Van Zimmerman Aggie The Pew 1,225,354.47
48 TimT Aggie The Pew 812,446.72
57 Rick Reynolds Aggie The Pew 651,842.26
61 Anthony Ayiomamitis Aggie The Pew 561,462.73
63 mattozan Aggie The Pew 554,345.34
65 shinozk Aggie The Pew 545,388.47
70 ILW8 Aggie The Pew 531,315.92
87 Michael Goetz Aggie The Pew 432,676.88
116 Brook Harste Aggie The Pew 275,183.31
117 Dave Aggie The Pew 274,746.56
135 1998golfer Aggie The Pew 216,137.21
152 Eudy Silva Aggie The Pew 169,379.12
170 gazzyk1ns Aggie The Pew 117,524.68
191 yank Aggie The Pew 104,699.80
197 Roger Aggie The Pew 58,481.21
198 Kouhki Aggie The Pew 58,446.39
Rank Name Score
1 Czech National Team 23,253,914.69
2 Aggie The Pew 22,908,666.88
3 SETI.Germany 18,039,919.30
4 Sicituradastra. 15,591,082.98
5 Rechenkraft.net 7,367,723.12
6 TeAm AnandTech 7,310,138.34
7 Crunching@EVGA 7,020,059.02
8 The Knights Who Say Ni! 4,851,377.53
9 BOINC@MIXI 4,649,873.78
10 AMD Users 3,698,845.58
Edit: If zunewantan and Scott Brown were both a single team, it would be ranked 5th !
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. | |
|
Dave  Send message
Joined: 13 Feb 12 Posts: 2829 ID: 130544 Credit: 954,793,678 RAC: 0
                     
|
Oh bingo we've done it:
Last update: 2019-01-12 22:30:06
Rank Name Score
1 Aggie The Pew 24 873 174.96
2 Czech National Team 24 849 337.76 | |
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13513 ID: 53948 Credit: 237,712,514 RAC: 0
                           
|
Oh bingo we've done it:
Last update: 2019-01-12 22:30:06
Rank Name Score
1 Aggie The Pew 24 873 174.96
2 Czech National Team 24 849 337.76
If recent history is any guide, we definitely should not get complacent.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 | |
|
|
Last update: 2019-01-13 00:30:07
Rank Name Team Score
1 zunewantan Aggie The Pew 7,764,355.98
3 Scott Brown Aggie The Pew 5,088,917.77
19 mackerel Aggie The Pew 2,092,217.32
32 SkyHighWeFly Aggie The Pew 1,516,359.74
34 Van Zimmerman Aggie The Pew 1,389,871.27
35 mfl0p Aggie The Pew 1,382,268.77
52 TimT Aggie The Pew 812,446.72
57 Rick Reynolds Aggie The Pew 710,787.37
64 ILW8 Aggie The Pew 635,866.82
66 mattozan Aggie The Pew 607,038.57
68 shinozk Aggie The Pew 604,342.48
69 Michael Goetz Aggie The Pew 602,793.27
72 Anthony Ayiomamitis Aggie The Pew 561,462.73
126 Brook Harste Aggie The Pew 275,183.31
127 Dave Aggie The Pew 274,746.56
132 1998golfer Aggie The Pew 269,014.64
142 Eudy Silva Aggie The Pew 222,373.24
158 yank Aggie The Pew 209,370.82
160 gazzyk1ns Aggie The Pew 170,494.06
179 Kouhki Aggie The Pew 117,327.06
206 Roger Aggie The Pew 58,481.21
Rank Name Score
1 Aggie The Pew 25,365,719.72
2 Czech National Team 25,164,903.65
3 SETI.Germany 19,979,308.39
4 Sicituradastra. 17,126,903.63
5 TeAm AnandTech 8,524,566.99
6 Rechenkraft.net 8,029,130.33
7 Crunching@EVGA 7,855,361.59
8 The Knights Who Say Ni! 5,390,093.68
9 BOINC@MIXI 4,983,655.69
10 AMD Users 4,032,851.19
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. | |
|
|
Last update: 2019-01-13 05:00:07
Rank Name Team Score
1 zunewantan Aggie The Pew 8,199,646.08
3 Scott Brown Aggie The Pew 5,304,313.38
19 mackerel Aggie The Pew 2,092,217.32
32 SkyHighWeFly Aggie The Pew 1,565,227.85
33 Van Zimmerman Aggie The Pew 1,442,597.67
36 mfl0p Aggie The Pew 1,382,268.77
53 TimT Aggie The Pew 812,446.72
58 Rick Reynolds Aggie The Pew 710,787.37
61 shinozk Aggie The Pew 663,295.67
67 ILW8 Aggie The Pew 635,866.82
68 Anthony Ayiomamitis Aggie The Pew 614,472.82
70 mattozan Aggie The Pew 607,038.57
72 Michael Goetz Aggie The Pew 602,793.27
129 Brook Harste Aggie The Pew 275,183.31
131 Dave Aggie The Pew 274,746.56
136 1998golfer Aggie The Pew 269,014.64
141 yank Aggie The Pew 261,746.89
149 Eudy Silva Aggie The Pew 222,373.24
162 gazzyk1ns Aggie The Pew 170,494.06
181 Kouhki Aggie The Pew 117,327.06
210 Roger Aggie The Pew 58,481.21
Rank Name Score
1 Czech National Team 26,385,771.75
2 Aggie The Pew 26,282,339.27
3 SETI.Germany 20,780,753.57
4 Sicituradastra. 17,564,576.01
5 TeAm AnandTech 8,689,050.60
6 Rechenkraft.net 8,498,391.36
7 Crunching@EVGA 8,125,714.03
8 The Knights Who Say Ni! 5,560,192.40
9 BOINC@MIXI 5,154,487.76
10 AMD Users 4,413,029.02
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. | |
|
|
Last update: 2019-01-13 13:45:08
Rank Name Team Score
1 zunewantan Aggie The Pew 9,109,394.11
3 Scott Brown Aggie The Pew 5,679,608.34
16 mackerel Aggie The Pew 2,375,102.89
32 SkyHighWeFly Aggie The Pew 1,677,226.45
33 Van Zimmerman Aggie The Pew 1,666,470.79
36 mfl0p Aggie The Pew 1,441,102.90
51 TimT Aggie The Pew 918,392.27
58 Anthony Ayiomamitis Aggie The Pew 726,396.85
59 shinozk Aggie The Pew 716,344.84
63 Rick Reynolds Aggie The Pew 710,787.37
73 ILW8 Aggie The Pew 635,866.82
74 mattozan Aggie The Pew 607,038.57
76 Michael Goetz Aggie The Pew 602,793.27
119 Brook Harste Aggie The Pew 381,110.86
121 yank Aggie The Pew 378,237.22
136 Dave Aggie The Pew 274,746.56
142 1998golfer Aggie The Pew 269,014.64
154 Eudy Silva Aggie The Pew 222,373.24
167 gazzyk1ns Aggie The Pew 170,494.06
184 Kouhki Aggie The Pew 117,327.06
215 Roger Aggie The Pew 58,481.21
Rank Name Score
1 Aggie The Pew 28,738,310.31
2 Czech National Team 28,327,681.20
3 SETI.Germany 21,805,106.67
4 Sicituradastra. 18,672,015.12
5 TeAm AnandTech 9,764,352.65
6 Rechenkraft.net 9,153,494.60
7 Crunching@EVGA 8,794,689.83
8 The Knights Who Say Ni! 5,818,726.00
9 BOINC@MIXI 5,311,977.61
10 AMD Users 4,694,335.36
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. | |
|
|
Last update: 2019-01-13 18:00:07
Rank Name Team Score
1 zunewantan Aggie The Pew 9,916,339.42
3 Scott Brown Aggie The Pew 5,902,804.96
16 mackerel Aggie The Pew 2,481,176.90
32 SkyHighWeFly Aggie The Pew 1,730,313.26
34 Van Zimmerman Aggie The Pew 1,719,284.11
36 mfl0p Aggie The Pew 1,494,206.09
46 TimT Aggie The Pew 1,030,465.79
59 shinozk Aggie The Pew 768,720.69
61 Rick Reynolds Aggie The Pew 762,449.47
62 Anthony Ayiomamitis Aggie The Pew 726,396.85
77 ILW8 Aggie The Pew 635,866.82
79 mattozan Aggie The Pew 607,038.57
81 Michael Goetz Aggie The Pew 602,793.27
120 Brook Harste Aggie The Pew 381,110.86
122 yank Aggie The Pew 378,237.22
131 1998golfer Aggie The Pew 327,923.76
139 Dave Aggie The Pew 274,746.56
155 Eudy Silva Aggie The Pew 222,373.24
170 gazzyk1ns Aggie The Pew 170,494.06
186 Kouhki Aggie The Pew 117,327.06
220 Roger Aggie The Pew 58,481.21
Rank Name Score
1 Aggie The Pew 30,308,550.15
2 Czech National Team 29,099,871.61
3 SETI.Germany 22,627,015.14
4 Sicituradastra. 19,263,860.81
5 TeAm AnandTech 9,928,208.81
6 Rechenkraft.net 9,742,987.87
7 Crunching@EVGA 9,114,488.99
8 The Knights Who Say Ni! 6,029,456.55
9 BOINC@MIXI 5,523,981.24
10 AMD Users 4,799,586.29
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. | |
|
|
Last update: 2019-01-13 18:00:07
Rank Name Team Score
61 Rick Reynolds Aggie The Pew 762,449.47
62 Anthony Ayiomamitis Aggie The Pew 726,396.85
We are toggling back and forth. My turn in 52 minutes.
This one may go down to the end ... whoever submits last, wins! :-) | |
|
|
Could be. Now thanks to Mike's great addition of tasks in the stats, it shows how the credit difference in tasks come into play. We've done the same number but you are leading. This is very cool! | |
|
|
Could be. Now thanks to Mike's great addition of tasks in the stats, it shows how the credit difference in tasks come into play. We've done the same number but you are leading. This is very cool!
Thank you for the inclusion of the task count in the stats, Michael !
Could you, please, correct a minor mistake in the top_teams.xml ?
<team>
<id>2280</id>
<name>Aggie The Pew</name>
<challenge_credit>31402026.762676</challenge_credit>
<challenge_tasks>573</challenge_credit>
</team>
Thanks
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. | |
|
Dave  Send message
Joined: 13 Feb 12 Posts: 2829 ID: 130544 Credit: 954,793,678 RAC: 0
                     
|
133 1998golfer Aggie The Pew 327 923.76 6
134 Dave Aggie The Pew 327 744.51 6
... | |
|
|
Could be. Now thanks to Mike's great addition of tasks in the stats, it shows how the credit difference in tasks come into play. We've done the same number but you are leading. This is very cool!
I am leading due to the larger FFT sizes that have fallen into my lap. Unfortunately, for my systems, the extra credit does not offset the extra run time.
I agree with the extra feature involving the number of tasks. Neat! | |
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13513 ID: 53948 Credit: 237,712,514 RAC: 0
                           
|
Could be. Now thanks to Mike's great addition of tasks in the stats, it shows how the credit difference in tasks come into play. We've done the same number but you are leading. This is very cool!
Thank you for the inclusion of the task count in the stats, Michael !
Could you, please, correct a minor mistake in the top_teams.xml ?
<team>
<id>2280</id>
<name>Aggie The Pew</name>
<challenge_credit>31402026.762676</challenge_credit>
<challenge_tasks>573</challenge_credit>
</team>
Thanks
Thanks for catching that! (it's now fixed)
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 | |
|
|
Michael Goetz wrote: Thanks for catching that! (it's now fixed)
As usual, you're fast !
Thank you !
Now, the stats with the added info:
Last update: 2019-01-13 23:30:08
Rank Name Team Score Tasks
1 zunewantan Aggie The Pew 10,515,407.30 192
3 Scott Brown Aggie The Pew 6,435,625.70 118
19 mackerel Aggie The Pew 2,481,176.90 45
32 Van Zimmerman Aggie The Pew 1,820,308.47 33
33 SkyHighWeFly Aggie The Pew 1,789,384.35 33
36 mfl0p Aggie The Pew 1,605,705.96 29
47 TimT Aggie The Pew 1,089,355.50 20
62 shinozk Aggie The Pew 827,814.94 15
65 Anthony Ayiomamitis Aggie The Pew 785,403.29 14
67 Rick Reynolds Aggie The Pew 762,449.47 14
69 ILW8 Aggie The Pew 747,069.86 14
72 Michael Goetz Aggie The Pew 707,505.23 13
85 mattozan Aggie The Pew 607,038.57 11
110 yank Aggie The Pew 436,480.61 8
123 Brook Harste Aggie The Pew 381,110.86 7
134 1998golfer Aggie The Pew 327,923.76 6
135 Dave Aggie The Pew 327,744.51 6
162 Eudy Silva Aggie The Pew 222,373.24 4
175 gazzyk1ns Aggie The Pew 170,494.06 3
189 Kouhki Aggie The Pew 117,327.06 2
220 Roger Aggie The Pew 58,481.21 1
Rank Name Score Tasks
1 Aggie The Pew 32,216,180.86 588
2 Czech National Team 30,626,168.68 558
3 SETI.Germany 24,692,121.05 451
4 Sicituradastra. 20,168,494.45 367
5 TeAm AnandTech 10,425,756.47 191
6 Rechenkraft.net 10,162,964.24 186
7 Crunching@EVGA 9,667,974.75 176
8 The Knights Who Say Ni! 6,415,097.05 119
9 BOINC@MIXI 5,905,969.91 108
10 AMD Users 5,232,087.61 96
Just for fun :) , here are the figures for our main opponent.
They have twice as much persons crunching than we do.
Rank Name Team Score Tasks
10 Honza Czech National Team 3,724,747.04 68
12 4bc3 Czech National Team 3,608,686.22 66
13 LookAS Czech National Team 3,232,045.19 59
20 boceli Czech National Team 2,475,693.03 45
25 eLPeCKo Czech National Team 2,095,159.84 38
30 killik Czech National Team 1,863,698.22 34
48 bundaboy Czech National Team 1,076,399.02 19
50 Viktor Svantner Czech National Team 1,028,436.16 19
54 Albert Czech National Team 986,480.12 18
58 Bazina hkfree Czech National Team 875,693.59 16
60 Venec Czech National Team 859,761.40 16
61 Honza1616 Czech National Team 839,332.21 15
70 Jarekcz Czech National Team 717,640.72 13
71 RoKro Czech National Team 713,662.77 13
74 1scorpion Czech National Team 706,032.92 13
84 Slava.7 Czech National Team 607,788.76 11
88 Worf_VX Czech National Team 594,150.35 11
97 HA-SOFT, s.r.o. Czech National Team 542,777.40 10
113 Doktor z CNT Czech National Team 430,588.92 8
125 Overtonesinger Czech National Team 379,341.43 7
129 chocholousek Czech National Team 339,230.16 6
144 vinn@[CNT] Czech National Team 274,851.20 5
146 harrykac Czech National Team 273,746.36 5
152 JakuP Czech National Team 267,901.80 5
157 Indy Czech National Team 227,817.17 4
163 xDarek Czech National Team 222,064.03 4
165 nenym Czech National Team 221,671.58 4
172 eisler jiri Czech National Team 215,663.93 4
177 Smrt_HB Czech National Team 169,219.58 3
178 martyn Czech National Team 168,700.73 3
191 oldjerryANO2011 Czech National Team 116,601.97 2
197 Vit Kliber Czech National Team 110,992.19 2
198 Dadu from Silesia Czech National Team 110,708.36 2
207 vmv Czech National Team 104,951.08 2
217 Petr.350 Czech National Team 58,569.17 1
218 Jelito2008 Czech National Team 58,550.73 1
221 pestis Czech National Team 58,451.15 1
223 Bigos2 Czech National Team 58,281.66 1
232 Jan Trunec Czech National Team 52,610.85 1
234 KPX Czech National Team 52,566.01 1
236 paricutin Czech National Team 52,563.06 1
240 Mufik Czech National Team 52,340.58 1
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. | |
|
Scott Brown Volunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer tester Project scientist
 Send message
Joined: 17 Oct 05 Posts: 2165 ID: 1178 Credit: 8,777,295,508 RAC: 0
                                     
|
2 DeleteNull SETI.Germany 6 684 770.27 121
3 Scott Brown Aggie The Pew 6 642 057.69 122
Too many small units!
| |
|
|
Last update: 2019-01-14 05:45:05
Rank Name Team Score Tasks
1 zunewantan Aggie The Pew 10,857,108.03 198
2 Scott Brown Aggie The Pew 6,871,354.25 126
17 mackerel Aggie The Pew 2,658,088.62 48
31 SkyHighWeFly Aggie The Pew 1,848,333.74 34
34 Van Zimmerman Aggie The Pew 1,820,308.47 33
36 mfl0p Aggie The Pew 1,658,673.15 30
47 TimT Aggie The Pew 1,148,113.56 21
61 shinozk Aggie The Pew 886,880.86 16
66 Anthony Ayiomamitis Aggie The Pew 785,403.29 14
69 Michael Goetz Aggie The Pew 766,427.87 14
70 Rick Reynolds Aggie The Pew 762,449.47 14
73 ILW8 Aggie The Pew 747,069.86 14
78 mattozan Aggie The Pew 666,070.54 12
111 yank Aggie The Pew 436,480.61 8
124 Brook Harste Aggie The Pew 381,110.86 7
139 1998golfer Aggie The Pew 327,923.76 6
140 Dave Aggie The Pew 327,744.51 6
166 gazzyk1ns Aggie The Pew 223,539.63 4
168 Eudy Silva Aggie The Pew 222,373.24 4
193 Kouhki Aggie The Pew 117,327.06 2
224 Roger Aggie The Pew 58,481.21 1
Rank Name Score Tasks
1 Aggie The Pew 33,571,262.60 612
2 Czech National Team 31,855,522.69 580
3 SETI.Germany 25,406,785.76 464
4 Sicituradastra. 21,199,429.60 386
5 TeAm AnandTech 11,083,357.68 203
6 Rechenkraft.net 10,496,226.96 192
7 Crunching@EVGA 10,104,020.65 184
8 The Knights Who Say Ni! 6,728,222.62 125
9 BOINC@MIXI 6,240,617.75 114
10 AMD Users 5,729,060.22 105
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. | |
|
|
It was getting a bit warm in my house last night... had to open windows rather than take my foot off the gas. As the units are so long, even if I NNW it wouldn't impact for another day. Looks like cooler weather towards mid week so I'll keep on crunching at current rate. | |
|
Dave  Send message
Joined: 13 Feb 12 Posts: 2829 ID: 130544 Credit: 954,793,678 RAC: 0
                     
|
I usually keep a small window ajar & it has literally been like that for months if not longer. With no GPU action had to close it this weekend. | |
|
|
2 DeleteNull SETI.Germany 6 684 770.27 121
3 Scott Brown Aggie The Pew 6 642 057.69 122
Too many small units!
Scott, I wish I had your (bad) luck. The larger sized units take about 50% greater time to complete for about 13% greater credits (at least on my systems). I realize it is random which units we get but I wish I had received many more smaller units.
Using my i7 7700k as an example, my last three units (two reported and one in progress) have taken just over 27 hours with four cores due to the smaller size. The longer ones at the start of the challenge were 40ish hours. | |
|
|
|